Philip Johnson inherited from his family a plot of land in New Canaan, Connecticut, United States and he decided to plan his house there. Together with the Glass House, he designed the Brick House for the guests and the Lake Pavilion, with a recreational use. The location, in a country propriety of 190000 m², was hidden to the public by a magnificent and dense forest surrendered by a near pond. Johnson placed the house in the upper of the land to adapt and maintain the visual continuity with having to operate considerably on the nature.
The house is separated on purpose of the Mies van der Rohe’s concerns about the structural logic and anticipated the following Johnson’s adaptations of Mies’s works in the 50s. The project was very polemical in its epoch, criticized and praised likewise, because there were many people that considered it as a little comfortable architectural model and other that found something innovative in the transparency of the material in order to the existing dialectic between the interior and the exterior. The walls contained not only the interior space but also the both of them through the dematerialization of the wall.
Kenneth Frampton said in his book “Critical history of the modern architecture” that the house is an essay of minimal structure, geometry, proportion and transparency and reflection effects.
The building geometry started from the idea of a parallelepiped and thanks to the fine steel painted in black blacksmith's trade, makes that the house forms integral part of the countryside. Johnson found some difficulties in the house, because the glass of the exterior walls misted up. He discovered a solution giving the house a permanent crossed air circulation besides putting an extraction system in the rigid core of the house. Mies found the same problem in the Farnsworth house, but this house has not got this kind of air circulation, consequently the glasses missed up.
The structure, principally based on steel profiles, obtained stability thanks to the cylinder that contained the chimney and the bathrooms: a unique volume inside the project. In this central core converged the main loads of the roof, generating an efficient distribution of the loads to the ground.
The interior of the Glass House is also very similar to the ones of the Ludwig Mies van der Rohe’s Farnsworth House, a simple interior design, of minimalist lines. The views defined the hierarchy of the interior spaces, giving to the living-room the most panoramic ones and to the more private ones, as the bedroom, direct views to a lush area. Almost everything of the furniture in the house is designed by Philip Johnson, except the pieces of furniture of the living-room that used the ones designed by Mies van der Rohe.
The house is separated on purpose of the Mies van der Rohe’s concerns about the structural logic and anticipated the following Johnson’s adaptations of Mies’s works in the 50s. The project was very polemical in its epoch, criticized and praised likewise, because there were many people that considered it as a little comfortable architectural model and other that found something innovative in the transparency of the material in order to the existing dialectic between the interior and the exterior. The walls contained not only the interior space but also the both of them through the dematerialization of the wall.
Kenneth Frampton said in his book “Critical history of the modern architecture” that the house is an essay of minimal structure, geometry, proportion and transparency and reflection effects.
The building geometry started from the idea of a parallelepiped and thanks to the fine steel painted in black blacksmith's trade, makes that the house forms integral part of the countryside. Johnson found some difficulties in the house, because the glass of the exterior walls misted up. He discovered a solution giving the house a permanent crossed air circulation besides putting an extraction system in the rigid core of the house. Mies found the same problem in the Farnsworth house, but this house has not got this kind of air circulation, consequently the glasses missed up.
The structure, principally based on steel profiles, obtained stability thanks to the cylinder that contained the chimney and the bathrooms: a unique volume inside the project. In this central core converged the main loads of the roof, generating an efficient distribution of the loads to the ground.
The interior of the Glass House is also very similar to the ones of the Ludwig Mies van der Rohe’s Farnsworth House, a simple interior design, of minimalist lines. The views defined the hierarchy of the interior spaces, giving to the living-room the most panoramic ones and to the more private ones, as the bedroom, direct views to a lush area. Almost everything of the furniture in the house is designed by Philip Johnson, except the pieces of furniture of the living-room that used the ones designed by Mies van der Rohe.